The Inaugural Ceremonies of the Freedmen’s Memorial to Abraham Lincoln

Within days of the end of the Civil War, on April 14, 1865 President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated. When a formerly enslaved woman in Marietta Ohio named Charlotte Scott heard the horrible news she exclaimed “we have lost the best friend the colored people ever had”. She gave the first five dollars she’d earned in freedom to her former master and said she hoped someday that there could be a memorial to President Lincoln. Fundraising would begin and by 1869, the Western Sanitary Commission assisting in the drive had raised over $16,000 with three-fourths coming from the U.S. Colored Troops. All funds had come from the formerly enslaved and freedmen, and on the 11th anniversary, in 1876, the first monument to Lincoln was dedicated. Present that day was Mr. James Yeatman, President of the Western Sanitary Commission, who shared that day the complete story of the Emancipation Memorial.

“The Rev. Wm. G. Eliot, of St. Louis, to whom had been assigned the presentation of the monument for the acceptance and approval of those who had contributed the funds for its erection, and to give a short historical account of the same, has been prevented from doing so, and it has only been within the last few hours that I received notice that he could not be present, and that I was requested to take his place, which I am but poorly qualified to do. Asking your kind and considerate indulgence, I shall proceed to do so, as the representative and president of the Western Sanitary Commission, to whom was entrusted the contributions of freedmen and the expenditure of the same for the erection of the freedmen’s memorial at the national capital. It is perhaps proper that I should tell you how it was that the [Western] sanitary commission came to be intrusted with this work. This commission, composed of Rev. Wm. G. Eliot, George Partridge. Carlos S. Greeley, Dr. J. B. Johnson and James B. Yeatman, well known Union citizens of St. Louis, were appointed by General John Fremont and afterwards ratified by Secretary Stanton. Their duties principally were to look after the sick, fit up and furnish hospitals, provide competent nurses, &c. But as the war progressed their duties were greatly enlarged. The care of the families and orphans of soldiers, Union refugees, the freedmen; in short, all the humanities growing out of the war came under their charge.For these purposes large sums of money, clothing, &c., were contributed and

sent to them, and I can say honestly and judiciously expended. Their total receipts amounted to over four and a quarter million. The whole of which was the spontaneous gift of individuals in all parts of the country, from San Francisco to Maine, and without the aid of a single organized auxiliary association. And finally, after the war was closed; after the lamented, honored and loved Lincoln had been so brutally assassinated in this city, five dollars was sent to us — the contribution of Charlotte Scott, a poor slave woman, who, on hearing of the assassination of President Lincoln, went in great distress to her mistress — that had been, for she was then free and said to her: “The colored people have lost their best friend on earth . Mr. Lincoln was our best friend and I will give five dollars of my wages towards erecting a monument to his memory. This money; this five dollars; this grain of a mustard seed, contributed by Charlotte Scott in gratitude to her deliverer, was sent  to  us  by  her  former  master, Mr. Wm  P. Rucker,  through  the  hands  of  General  T.  C.  H.  Smith,  then in  command  of  the  military  post  of  St.  Louis,  having  received  it  from Mr.  Rucker,  who  was  a  Union  refugee,  from  Virginia,  having  sought safety  for  himself  and  family  in  Marietta,  Ohio,  taking  along  with him  Charlotte  Scott,  and  perhaps  others belonging  to  him.  It  was  this five  dollars  that  was  the  foundation  of  this  beautiful  and appropriate memorial  which  we  now  see  before  us.  General  Smith  addressed  a letter  to  me,  conveying  it,  which  was  as  follows;

St.  Louis,  April,  26,  1865. 

James  E.  Yeatman Esq, : 

My  Dear  Sir  :  A  poor  negro  woman  of  Marietta,  Ohio,  one  of  those made  free  by  President  Lincoln’s  proclamation, proposes that a monument  to  their  dead  friend  be  erected  by  the  colored  people  of  the United  States.  She  has  handed  to  a  person  in  Marietta  five  dollars  as her  contribution  for  the  purpose.  Such  a  monument  would  have  a history  more  grand  and  touching  than  any  of  which  we  have  account. Would  it  not  be  well  to  take  up  this  suggestion  and  make  it  known to  the  freedmen?

Yours  truly,  T.  C.  Smith. 

In  compliance  with  General  Smith’s  suggestion  I  published  his  letter with  a  card,  stating  that  any  desiring  to  contribute  to  a  fund for such a  purpose,  that  the  Western  Sanitary  Commission  would  receive  the 

same  and  see  that  it  was judiciously appropriated  as intended.  In response  to  this  communication  liberal contributions  were  received 

from  colored  soldiers  under  the  command  of  General  J.  W.  Davidson, headquarters  at  Natchez,  Miss.,  amounting  in  all  to  $12,150.  This was  subsequently  increased  from  other  scources  to  $16,242. 

 From  the  liberal  contributions  made  in  the  first  instance,  we  were led  to  believe  that  a  very  much  larger  sum  would  have been donated. But,  as  our  determination  was  to  have  a  free  will  offering  without  solicitation we  determined  to  rest  with  what  was  voluntarily  contributed. This  prevented  the  execution  of  a  design  made  and  submitted  by Harriet Hosmer,one  of  America’s most  renowned  sculptors.  The design 

was one of  great  beauty  and merit,  and  could it have  been executed, it  would  have  been one of  the grandest and most beautiful monumental  works  of  art  ever erected  in  this  or  any  other country.  I  mention this  now  as the  design  and  its  adoption  by  the  commission  was generally  known,  and  some  explanation  for  its  non-execution  may  be  deemed necessary.  It  was published  in  the  London  Art Journal and other journals  in  this and  other  countries. I trust  yet that  the  gratitude of  the  freed people  will  prompt  them  to execute  this  grand  design  I now proceed  to  give  you  the  history of  the  Lincoln  monument as adopted  and  executed. One of the  members  of  the  Western Sanitary Commission, Rev. Wm.  G.  Eliot,  being  in  Florence  in  the  autumn of 1869 when visiting the  studio  of  Mr.  Thomas  Ball  saw the group subsequently adopted, and  was  so much pleased  with  it  that  he  spoke strongly  in  its  praise after returning  to  St.  Louis.  He  had  learned from Mr.Ball  that  the work  was  conceived  and executed  under  the  first influence  of  the  news of  Mr. Lincoln’s  assassination.  No order for such a  group  had  been received,  but  Mr.  Ball  felt  sure that  the  time  would  come  when there would  be  a  demand  for  it, and,  at  any  rate,  he  felt an inward  demand to  produce  it. His aim  was  to  present  one single idea representing the  great work  for  the  accomplishment  of which  Abraham  Lincoln lived and died ;  and  all  accessory  ideas are carefully  excluded.  Mr. Ball  also determined  not  to part  with  it, except under such circumstances as  to  insure its  just  appreciation, not  merely  as  a  work  of  art but as  a  labor  of  love — a  tribute  to American patriotism 

For several  years  it  has  stood there  in  its  place,  greatly admired, but not  finding  the direction  of  its  rightful destination. But, when the  artist heard  of  the  possible  use  to which  it  might  be  put  as  the memorial  of  freedom  by  the emancipated  slaves  themselves, he  at  once said  that  he  should hold  it  with that  view  until the commission  were prepared  to take  action, and  that  the  price to be  paid  would  be altogether a secondary  consideration. When the description  was  given to  the other  members  of  the  Western Sanitary  Commission, they  sent 

for photographs four  of  which, presenting  the  group  at different  points of  view, were taken  in  Florence and  forwarded to  them. They  at  once decided  to accept  the  design, and an order was  given  for  its immediate execution in bronze, in accordance  with  the suggestions made  by  Mr. Ball.  The  original group  was  in  Italian  marble, and  differs  in  some respects from the  bronze  group  now  to  be inaugurated. In  the original the kneeling slave is represented as perfectly passive receiving the birth  of  freedom  from  the  hand of  the  great  liberator.  But  – the artist  justly  changed  this, to bring the  presentation  nearer  to true historical  fact, by making the emancipated  slave  an instrument in his own deliverance. He  is accordingly  represented  as exerting his  own  strength  with strained muscles in breaking the chain  which  had  bound  him. A far greater  degree  of  dignity and vigor, as well as of historical accuracy, is thus imparted. The original  was  also  changed  by introducing,  instead  of  an ideal slave,  the  picture  of  a     living  man — the  last  slave  ever taken  up  in  Missouri  under  the fugitive  slave  law, and who was rescued from his  captors  (who had  transcended their legal authority) under the orders of the Provost  Marshal of St.  Louis. His name is Archer Alexander, and his condition of servitude legally continued  until  the emancipation act became  the Law  of  the  land. A  photographic  picture was sent to  Mr.  Ball, who has given both the face and manly bearing of  the negro. The ideal  group is thus converted into the literal truth of history without losing anything of its artistic conception or effect. The monument, in  bronze, now inaugurated was cast at the Royal 

foundry, in  Munich. An  exact copy of  the original group as first  designed by  Mr.  Ball,  has  been executed  by  him  in  pure  white Italian marble  for  the  Western Sanitary  Commission, and will  be permanently placed, as Freedom’s Memorial in  some  public building of  St.  Louis. Of  the  eminent sculptor, Thomas  Ball, to whose genius and love  of country  the whole  purpose of  the  work  is due, it is unnecessary to speak. His design  was  accepted,  after  three years  diligent  seeking, solely  on its  merits. But it is a source of congratulation to all lovers of the American Union that this monument, in  memory of  the people’s President and the freedmen’s best friend, is from the hand of one who not only stands  in  the  foremost  rank  of living  artists, but who is himself proud to be called an American citizen. 

The  amount  paid  Mr.  Ball  for the  bronze  group  was  $17,000, every cent  of  which  has  been remitted to  him. So you have a finished monument, all  paid  for. The  Government appropriated $3,000  for the  foundation  and pedestal  upon  which  the  bronze group  stands, making  the  cost, in all,  $20,000.  I  have  thus given you  a  brief  history of  the Freedmen’s  Memorial Monument, and how and why the Western Sanitary Commission came to have anything  to  do  with  it. To them it has been a labor of love. In the execution  of  the  work they  have exercised  their  best  judgment — done  the  best  that  could  be done with the limited  means  they  had to  do  it  with.  It  remains with you and those who will follow to say how wisely or how well it has been done. Whatever  of  honor, whatever of  glory belongs to this work, should  be  given to Charlotte Scott, the poor slave woman. Her  offering of gratitude and  love, like  that  of  the widow’s mite, will be remembered in  heaven when  the  gifts of  those rich in this world’s goods shall have passed  away and been forgotten.”*

*INAUGURAL CEREMONIES OF THE FREEDMEN’S MEMORIAL MONUMENT TO ABRAHAM LINCOLN, William Greenleaf Eliot Personal Papers, University Archives, Department of Special Collections, Washington University Libraries